Case Study(PumpX)
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Last updated
Was this helpful?
PumpX demonstrates the transformative potential of Heima's omni-chain infrastructure in real-world applications.
PumpX started as a single-chain DEX focused on meme tokens within the Solana ecosystem. Despite strong initial traction, user growth was limited by Solana-specific onboarding friction, token support, and gas awareness.
By integrating Heima's account, chain, and agent abstraction layers, PumpX was able to seamlessly upgrade its platform without rewriting core logic:
Onboarding: Plug in for Web2-style login. Automatically creates Omni-account.
Key Management: PumpX continues to use its custodians as the master signer, while Heima's omni-executor requests authorizations from PumpX.
Execution: Leverage Heima's cross-chain routing and agent-based automation.
Before Heima:
Only supported SOL for purchase
Prices were shown in SOL
No bridging or chain support outside Solana
Pay with Any Token: USDT, BNB, ETH, etc. — from any chain
Unified Price Display: All meme tokens are priced in USD regardless of the origin chain
Zero Gas Management: User never sees or pays gas directly — it's abstracted by intent and routing layer
Cross-chain Routing: Heima routes to the cheapest market across Solana, BNB, Base, etc.
No Compromise on Speed: Heima prioritizes the trading speed with specified intent filler.
This transformation demonstrates Heima's ability to simplify complex blockchain interactions, abstract away technical barriers, and create seamless, user-friendly DeFi experiences without requiring extensive rebuilding of existing infrastructure.
To ensure secure integration and production-grade reliability, PumpX underwent a complete third-party security audit—focusing on modules deployed alongside Heima’s infrastructure.
🔒 Audit Summary
Contract logic and upgradeability
Proxy execution mechanisms
Cross-chain transaction security
Potential exploit vectors in intent-handling and relayer logic
The audit confirmed PumpX’s implementation met key security best practices. Findings were addressed and re-reviewed to meet production-level standards.
Conducted by , the audit covered:
📄